Sunday, 25 January 2015

Abbott acknowledges internal critics but likens social media to 'electronic graffiti'

Abbott acknowledges internal critics but likens social media to 'electronic graffiti'

Abbott acknowledges internal critics but likens social media to 'electronic graffiti'






PM says he has had some ‘candid conversations’ with colleagues over
his performance and tells reporters they should not pay attention to
‘electronic graffiti’











Tony Abbott at an Australian flag raising and citizenship ceremony in Canberra.



Tony Abbott at a flag raising and citizenship ceremony in Canberra on Monday. Photograph: Stefan Postles/Getty Images 
 
 

Tony Abbott
has acknowledged unhappiness within his ranks, saying he has had some
pretty candid conversations with his colleagues over the break but
dismissed social media criticism of his performance as “electronic
graffiti”.



Facing increasing internal dissent over his recent performances, such as backflips over Medicare, Abbott promised “a more consultative and collegial government” in the new year, while admitting he had not consulted his colleagues on the knighthood for Prince Philip.


He said many government members had raised a range of issues,
including electoral matters, the government’s achievements but also
“unfinished business”.



Advertisement
“We’re going to crack on with that,” said Abbott.


“As you would expect, I have pretty candid conversations with my
colleagues,” Abbott said. “And this isn’t supposed to be just a ‘yes
sir, yes sir, three bags full’ exercise. Obviously we’ve had some pretty
candid conversations about all sorts of subjects.”



The prime minister said while he took enormous pride in the
government’s achievements last year, he would also learn the lessons of
2014.



“You can always do better, and a couple of the things that obviously
we need to do better is we probably need to be a more consultative and
collegial government in the 12 months ahead. I think we need to be more
conscious of the realities in the parliament, in the 12 months ahead.”



Acknowledging internal grumbles, his assistant treasurer Josh
Frydenberg urged his colleagues to “stick together” and get behind their
leader, as Abbott had earned the right to lead.



“Politics is a team sport,” Frydenberg told the ABC. “If you disrupt
that team harmony then it absolutely costs you at the ballot box and I
think my colleagues are very conscious of that.”



“We have a captain in Tony Abbott who’s earned the right to that job.
He was outstanding in opposition and through his leadership Labor got
the lowest primary vote in 100 years.”



Frydenberg’s comments came as the prime minister created another
storm of criticism on Australia Day when he asked the Queen to bestow a
knighthood on her husband,
Prince Philip. Abbott acknowledged he did not consult his colleagues on the decision, agreeing it was a “captain’s pick”.



Advertisement
And he dismissed criticism on social media, referring to it as electronic graffiti.


“Look, I’ll leave social media to its own devices,” Abbott said.


“Social media is kind of like electronic graffiti and I think that in
the media, you make a big mistake to pay too much attention to social
media.



“You wouldn’t report what’s sprayed up up on the walls of buildings
and look, as I said, social media has its place, but it’s anonymous.
It’s often very abusive and in a sense, it has about as much authority
and credibility as graffiti that happens to be put forward by means of
IT.”



Abbott has been trying to replenish the government’s flagging stock since late last year, with little success in the polls. He is due to lay out his government’s agenda for 2015 in a speech to the National Press Club next week.


Abbott used the Australia Day press conference on Monday to send another message to his colleagues.


“Obviously this is the start of a new year,” Abbott said.


“Every year is important, but this year is particularly important.
Today we celebrate our country’s strengths but we’ve got to acknowledge
that we can always strive to do better and to be better; at an
individual level, at a corporate level, at a national level.



“And it’s important that the government build on the achievements of
2014. It’s important that the government learn the lessons of 2014, and
that’s what I’ve been talking to my colleagues about, as you would
expect.”



Abbott again raised the issue of “Labor’s debt” and said without
tough decisions “the risk is that we will become a second-rate country,
living on our luck”.



 
 

PM Abbott awards imperial bauble to Prince Philip: Time to end the farce

PM Abbott awards imperial bauble to Prince Philip: Time to end the farce



1,109 63



Official announcement of Prince Philip and Augus Houston's knighthoods and some of the reaction


Just when you think Tony Abbott's decision in 2014 to
restore imperial knighthoods couldn't become any more bizarre, the prime
minister uses the Australia Day's honour list to award a knighthood to
the Queen's consort Prince Philip. History editor and Queensland ARM
convenor Dr Glenn Davies reports.




THE MONARCHISTS have been asking
themselves, with theAustralia Day honours list announcement upon us and
the Queen’s Birthday honours list in June, who should be nominated for
an AK or AD award? 




The real question is: would Prime Minister Tony Abbott dare name any
knights ‘n dames in 2015 after the level of satire it inspired last
year.




The answer is: "Yes".



In the lead up to Australia Day 2015. there had been no media about the awarding again of any Australian imperial honours. The Australian of the Year awards had been well publicised but not the possible "Knights and Dames" appointments.



On 27 March 2014, I wroteabout
how Prime Minister Tony Abbott, the former director of Australians for a
Constitutional Monarchy, announced the return of imperial honours for
Australians. On 19 March 2014, on the Prime Minister’s recommendation, Her Majesty The Queen approved amendments to the Letters Patent for the Order of Australia to reinstate appointment of Knights and Dames of the Order of Australia.




At the time, the PM said he believed this was:



"... an important grace note in our national life."






For the first time since 1986, “pre-eminent” Australians were to be honoured as Knights and Dames in the Order of Australia



David Morris, national director of the Australian Republican Movement described the return of knighthoods as



“... turning the clock back to a colonial frame of mind that we had outgrown as a nation.”




The three Australian "Knights and Dames" created last year were: The Honourable Dame Quentin Bryce AD CVO, former Governor-General of Australia; His Excellency General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC (Retd), Governor-General of Australia; and Her Excellency Professor the Honourable Dame Marie Bashir AD CVO, Governor of New South Wales.



Today it was announced the second and third AK’s to be awarded in the restored Knight of the Order of Australia division are His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh and Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston (retd).One is currently the Chair of the Council for the Order of Australia, and the other … well, the husband of the monarch.



As a palace spokeswoman said:



"Knights and dames in the Order of Australia are approved by the
Queen on recommendation of the prime minister. We wouldn't comment
further on the process."







Still, it’s rather glaring as to which has the greater conflict of interest.



The monarchists have been excited about turning the clock back and been suggesting names for knighthood such as tennis great Rod Laver
MBE, the living Victoria Cross recipients, Australian Nobel Prize
winners (even posthumous), previous GG’s, retired Generals and Chief
Justices.




Interestingly, one of the only two pre-1985 AK’s living is Prince
Charles and, with the provision that a knight can be a non-citizen, I’d suggested good money could be laid on Princes William or Harry receiving a knighthood in 2015 for having turned up
in Australia a few times. On that logic, perhaps one should also be
given to Prince George, who showed us exactly what he thinks of the
ex-convicts with his instantly disdainful chuck of the toy bilby at
Taronga Zoo. There’s even the depressing thought Rupert Murdoch (now a
U.S. citizen) could be in line for a knighthood!




I was not far off though. Instead it was the Grandfather Royal, Prince Philip, who received an AK for his contribution to Australia throughout
the Queen's 62-year reign and it was his his long life of service and
dedication PM Abbott chose to be honoured by Australia. Special mention
was also made of the Duke of Edinburgh Awards in Australia, which he said had positively influenced the lives of hundreds of thousands of young Australians.






It was Prime Minister Gough Whitlam who axed knighthoods in 1975, only to watch Malcolm Fraser reinstate "Knights and Dames" a year later.



Then, in 1986, Prime Minister Bob Hawke abolished the category all over again. John Howard
is understood to have rejected the idea of reinstating "Knights and
Dames" on the grounds that the endless chopping and changing was
undermining the dignity of the honour. Many of his advisers also
believed the Liberal Party would be mocked and seen as out of touch with
modern Australia. (Howard is reported today as saying he did not agree with the restoration of these titles and would be unlikely to accept one.)




In the Australian honours system, appointments to the Order of Australia confer recognition for outstanding achievement and service. The Knight/Dame of the Order of Australia is awarded
for extraordinary and pre-eminent achievement and merit in service to
Australia or humanity at large. It is now the nation’s highest award.
Governors-General become a Knight or Dame of the Order of Australia by
virtue of their appointment as Governor-General. In addition to
Governors-General, there will be a maximum of four appointments a year,
excluding honorary awards to non-Australian citizens.




However, when Prime Minister Abbott named outgoing Governor-General Quentin Bryce a dame and her successor General Peter Cosgrove a knight the satirists had a field day.





Australian historian James Curran wrote in the Canberra Times, 31 March 2014 that



'In the symbolic landscape of Australian civic culture, Tony
Abbott’s restoration last week of Australian knights and dames perhaps
stands as one of the most pompous, pretentious, nostalgic and
self-indulgent prime ministerial decisions in a generation
.'





The re-establishment of the Imperial honours was done quickly and
without consultation by PM Abbott with his Federal front bench, let
alone the first two recipients.




IA columnist Bob Ellis statedthat
Prime Minister Abbott wanted to distract and deflect, as well as punish
and shame his Opposition counterpart and abruptly came up with his plan
to ennoble Quentin Bryce.




Senior correspondent Barry Everingham wrote that former Governor-General Ms Quentin Bryce
heard of her “elevation” on the ABC's 8.30am radio news and that the
Queen heard from an aide who was contacted by a member of the Australian
media. Everingham also observed that
Prime Minister Abbott trashed vice-regal protocol in the last moments
of the term of Quentin Bryce as Governor General, at the same time as
causing grave offence to the monarch.






And as contributor Clint Howitt argued:



'Tony Abbott's abrupt decision to bring back imperial honours has
driven a wedge through the body politic from the vice-regal office
holders, through the rank and file members of all political parties and
through the voting public.'





Imperial honours are divisive and are out of touch with modern, multicultural, egalitarian Australia.



Professor Geoff Gallop, the national chair of the Australian Republican Movement, said today:



“This decision to appoint more knighthoods is the end result of
the politicization of the system under Tony Abbott. We had a perfectly
good honours system run by Australians. Placing the Knights and Dames
system over and above that is demeaning the worthiness and opinions of
Australians."







On 27 March 2014, when PM Abbott introduced the archaic British
aristocratic titles above the Australian national honours system,
Australians flooded the Australian Republican Movement with such
overwhelming numbers the Australian Republican Movement server was on the verge of crashing.




David Morris, national director of the Australian Republican Movement, stated at the time:



"Since Mr Abbott’s announcement about 'knights and dames', our
annualised membership growth rate has spiked to about 5000%. Many are
re-joining, having previously been members. Many are people who say they
voted for Mr Abbott’s Government but are dismayed by his personal
decision, apparently made only in consultation with the Queen."





Perhaps another own goal by the Prime Minister may be good for the movement towards an Australian republic.



In an Australia Day eve book launch speech, Leader of the Federal Opposition, Bill Shorten urged
Australians to support an Australian republic and head of state,
arguing it would reflect the nation's "modern identity, our place in our
region and our world". We now appear to have two federal political
leaders divided clearly along monarchy and republic lines.






If our identity today is Australian, then surely our national honours
should be thoroughly Australian. It’s time to make the case for
Australia to have a head of state that is one of our own — not someone
from the other side of the world.




We should be advocating a fully and unambiguously independent Australia, no knights or dames required. How ridiculous!



Find out more about the Australian Republican Movement at ouridentity.org.

Friday, 23 January 2015

In Praise of Tony Abbott - The AIM Network

In Praise of Tony Abbott - The AIM Network



In Praise of Tony Abbott














Now before you start screaming, and wondering what kind of drug is this stupid bastard on, let me take a moment to explain.


Yes, it’s true I have been mainlining schardenfreude and it’s heady
stuff, the real deal, not that synthetic crap you’d score from some guy
called Sir Rupert behind the dunnies at the Melbourne Club.



Happily, there are many more like me and it’s all due to the efforts of Tony Abbott.


You see without Tony Abbott, the Left in Australia would still be languishing somewhere in the 1990s.


Abbott has been able to unite the Left including the more moderate
sections of his own party in a way that no other Conservative politician
including Menzies or Howard could ever do.



What may be termed as the ‘traditional Left’ with its union
affiliations and working class support base had been in steady decline
during the Hawke-Keating years and all but disappeared during the Howard
regime aided and abetted by the ‘small target’ stance taken by Beasley
and Crean.



Generational difference also played its part. Generation X, “bred in
modest comfort and now housed in universities” felt no affinity with
unionism nor with being ‘working class’ but rather were drawn toward
Howard’s promises of a ‘relaxed and comfortable’ middle-class.



Who need unionism with its connotations of entrenched corruption and
grimy fingered belligerence? Middle-class welfare and family tax
benefits A and B were the go, and access to easy credit provided the
lubricant for purchase of the house, the 4WD, and those oh so important
private school fees.



No one wanted to question what the price would be for this bourgeois bonanza least of all Howard and Costello.


Generation Y followed dutifully in Gen X’s footsteps.


This is not to say that Leftist activism ceased, but the younger
generation were drawn to the Greens rather than the ALP, and while the
traditional unionists fought and won their last great battle in 1998
against Corrigan over the Wharf dispute, they also saw the writing on
the wall, took their redundancy packages and got while the going was
good.



Nor did the Rudd-Gillard-Rudd years see any revival of the Left’s
fortunes and arguably the continued vacuum allowed on one hand, the rise
of a meglomaniac with little talent and on the hand, a competent
politician hamstrung by an appalling sense of timing.



Enter Tony Abbott.


Abbott’s short-comings have been well documented on this site and in
the MSM over the past few days so there’s no need to regurgitate them.



What Abbott has done from the outset of his government, is to provide
the impetus for the emergence of a new and most significantly,
intergenerational Left.



Almost single-handely, Abbott has provided the glue for the cohesion
of young and old, middle class and working poor to unite in opposition
to his government’s policies.



The fact that a Conservative politician rather than a Progressive has
been able to tap the vast well-spring of voter dissatisfaction and
frustration with Neo-liberalism which has been building steadily over
the past decade and a half is a delicious irony. (note to self: no more
schardenfreude this arvo or you’ll have to go and have a little bit of a
lie down).



Moreover, this new and united voice has served as a clear prompt and reminder to the minor parties.


For the Greens it’s an indication of continued and growing support
and this is evidenced by the outcome of the recent Victorian state
election.



For Palmer United and the independents its a firm reminder not to
waver in their opposition to the LNP’s deliberate determination to
destroy the very foundations on which Australia has been built, for to
do so is political suicide.



The emergent New Left bears little resemblance to the traditional
Left save for its concern with social justice. As argued above, it is
intergenerational in a manner that the old Left could never achieve.



It is new media (social media) savvy and it has found its found its
voice, one which carries across the globe in an instant, and more
importantly it is the voice of a collected people from all walks of life
as they unite in concern for the fate of their society and of the
planet.



While its likely that a new Left would have emerged in the near
future, under a more moderate leader it is unlikely that it would have
occurred so swiftly or with such determination.



So as the Wreck of the Hesperus that has been Abbott’s leadership
sinks beneath the waves, let us give a brief moment of thanks to the
individual who, in his determination to divide the nation unconsciously
provided the tinder to the flames which are now engulfing him.













Thursday, 22 January 2015

Backbench Revolt Looming - The AIM Network

Backbench Revolt Looming - The AIM Network



Backbench Revolt Looming














The Prime Minister has lost the respect
of some of his colleagues and has only a few months to turn things
around or his position is terminal. These are the messages coming from
senior liberals now.



Surely Tony Abbott’s days as Prime Minister are numbered. That is the conclusion political commentators, watchers and back room deal makers are drawing following the backflip on the Medicare rebate, last week.


But make no mistake, it isn’t just the Medicare calamity.


There are too many self-inflicted wounds in the PM’s office. It has
been a litany of verbal slip-ups, miss-stepping, confusion, lack of
proper consideration for the consequences of his actions, other
ministerial stuff-ups and an overall performance that has consistently
demonstrated how much better Labor were at governing the country, no
matter how bad they were at governing themselves.



The Abbott bleed has seeped and spread out across the floor along the
corridors and into the offices of the collaterally damaged marginal
seat holders. Twelve months ago, they thought they had at least a six
year tenure in the bag. Everywhere in Liberal Town the anguished cries
of despair are now so loud, passers-by are rushing to and fro wondering
how contagious is death-by-despair.



MSMMainstream
media commentators are now scathing in their condemnation of the
government’s performance and its inability to cut deals in the senate,
citing the absence of consultation and poor public relations. But it
goes well beyond that.



They are lambasting Abbott’s leadership capabilities, his
communications chaos and the anxiety fumbling that has surfaced so early
into a new year, a time that was supposed to be the beginning of a new
approach, a turn-around in all their political fortunes.



Back downs have been a hallmark of this government in its short
history. From the GP co-payment, Higher Education, the Racial
Discrimination Act, the Burqa ban, the Paid Parental Leave scheme, all
of which in football parlance have been a coach’s nightmare. Team
Australia has become a laughing stock.



As much as his opponents would like to see Tony Abbott stay, only
because he is Labor’s best advertisement, his own party are now resigned
to doing a Kevin Rudd number on him. So who will play the Julia Gillard
role and tap him on the shoulder? Who else but the woman who will
replace him. But when?



The irony is that none of those policy decisions were necessary in
the first place. The government could have marked time for three years,
gained the trust of the people, ensured themselves a second term before
doing anything drastic. Their first mistake when gaining government was
to blame Labor for everything.



It propelled them into action of the ideological kind, not the smart
politics kind. In their haste they started to believe in their own
rhetoric and ran down the cost-cutting road too quickly and too eagerly.
They could have waited and taken some unpopular policy proposals to the
next election and still won. But the ‘debt and deficit’ mantra rang in
their ears like jingle bells.



jeckylAlmost
immediately this Jeckle and Hyde rabble demonstrated a contempt for
climate change as well as science generally. They engaged in quite
brutal treatment of asylum seekers and went on a trade union witch hunt.
But worst of all, they thought they could bring down a harsh and unfair
budget replete with spending cuts that would hurt the old, the poor and
the sick and get away with it by blaming Labor.



It hasn’t worked.


They rushed headlong into the mire, desperate to display their
ideology and convert it into practical action, but forgot to take the
people with them. Now, after a plethora of rash decisions born of poor
management, they have been caught out.



Those who voted them into office (the 4% that decide elections), have
seen something quite different from what they saw when the government
was in opposition.



The minority swinging voters weren’t expecting that; not after all
the promises that were made. Now, they have had a change of heart and
seen this gang of misfits for what they really are. The government are
rattled, dysfunctional and in panic mode. And that means one thing: more
mistakes to come.



Getting rid of Abbott will achieve little. It will not reverse their
fortunes. They could also get rid of Hockey, Morrison, Dutton and Pyne,
but that won’t help them either. The damage has been done and it’s all
their own doing. Labor haven’t contributed beyond a defiant stand in the
senate. What a sorry tale it is.



So, the big question now is when, but even that doesn’t matter. Now,
what matters is that Bill Shorten and Labor start acting like an
alternative government releasing sound policies and demonstrating
superior leadership skills.



butlerIt
is time for their best people, Albanese, Bowen, Plibersek, Clare,
Butler and co. to take command of the news cameras with articulate
messages of direction on the economy, the environment, on education and
health and make sure they take the people with them.



It’s theirs for the taking.












Thursday, 15 January 2015

JD Anthony ‏@ranterulze
Another pointed comment from Fiona @FionaKatauskas #satire or #truth ? From @newmatilda


More Pythonesque than John Cleese - The AIM Network

More Pythonesque than John Cleese - The AIM Network



More Pythonesque than John Cleese














What a bunch of cowards. To avoid yet another
embarrassing defeat in the senate, the PM capitulates on the proposed
reduction of the Medicare rebate and sends out the new girl, the one
with the least experience, to announce their incompetence to the world.
What cowardice!



Tony Abbott couldn’t even stand beside her in support. Or, did she prefer that he didn’t?
“I’ve heard, I’ve listened and I’m deciding to take this
action now. It’s off the table and I stand ready to engage, to consult,
and to talk to the sector,”
she said. Really?



duuton2If
ever the new Minister for Health looked like the sacrificial offering
to a media that would have much preferred to grill Peter Dutton, Sussan
Ley was it. Yet Dutton, who quietly introduced this back door decision
by regulation just two days before Christmas, was nowhere to be seen.



Another day in government, another painful backflip. In an earlier
article of mine a respondent expressed his uncertainty as to whether
this government was just chronically stupid or were they evil. I told
him they were likely both. They were mostly stupid but when that failed,
they turned to evil.



This most recent saga vindicates that claim. The reduction of the
rebate for consultations, which was yet another attempt to inflict pain
on the most vulnerable, was doomed from the start. There was no
consultation with the medical profession, just a quietly executed
decision to impose a further burden on GPs with a planned starting date
ahead of introducing the bill before parliament.

The government’s pathetic attempts to make adjustments to Medicare are
more pythonesque than John Cleese and the Monty team could have created.
Firstly a $7 co- payment, then a $5 cut in rebates for consultations
and now this vindictive act of deception, all of which have resulted in
failure.



bruceHow
embarrassing too for Bruce Billson MP who went on the front foot in
support of the reduction only to find himself up the well-known creek in
a canoe, possibly made by the Adelaide shipyards, but without a paddle.



Mis-management of this magnitude in the corporate world would be
terminal. No responsible board of directors could tolerate such
incompetence. Yet we, the long suffering people, who manage our affairs
with calculated precision or pay the price, are forced to wince in pain
at what we can best describe as a comedy routine turned sour.



The government is insisting that if Labor continues to block these
measures in the Senate, it should propose an alternative. Really? Labor
is not in government and is not in the business of helping the
government out of this, or any other, hole it digs for itself. But I’d
be happy to.



tax returnIncreasing
the Medicare levy is one possible answer. But not for those earning
less than $50,000 a year. A modest increase from 1.5% to 2% for those
earning $50,001 to $100,000. An increase from 1.5% to 2.5% for those
earning $100,001 to $200,000. And an increase from 1.5% to 3% for those
earning above $200,000 per annum. I am sure that will go a long way to
covering the $10 billion shortfall they are trying to fill. If it
doesn’t, then they might take more than a cursory glance at the $300
private health insurance rebate. Really boys and girls, it’s not that
hard.



Is it any wonder Bill Shorten is now the preferred prime minister
even though he has done nothing to deserve it? How much more would the
voters prefer him if he stuck his head up and fired a few cannons
instead of water pistols? It’s not as if he doesn’t have the ammunition.



How much more of this ineptitude are we expected to endure?



Thursday, 8 January 2015

"I'm With Stupid" Man Arrested; Imagine If He'd Been Against Stupid! - The AIM Network

"I'm With Stupid" Man Arrested; Imagine If He'd Been Against Stupid! - The AIM Network



“I’m With Stupid” Man Arrested; Imagine If He’d Been Against Stupid!














Ok, for those of you who haven’t caught up with the Queensland man
who was arrested for standing next to LNP supporters and waving while
wearing an “I’m With Stupid” T-Shirt I give you the link “The Courier Mail”‘s report just so you know that it isn’t made up!



Now, because I write on this site, I’m often accused of being a
lefty, which is ridiculous because I’m a Capitalist through and through.
Any time I see I chance to make money, I’m there, and I’d be as rich as
Gina or Rupert if it wasn’t for the fact that – like the current
government – I suffer from poor marketing.



I read the article and immediately saw an opportunity to make a few
bucks by marketing a t-shirt saying “I’m Not With Stupid – I’m Voting
xxx”. Of course, The Greens would be too full of priniciple to replace
the xxx with “Green”, and Labor supporters don’t have any money because
they’ve put everything on the credit card, so the obvious person to
approach with the idea was Clive Palmer.



Initiallly, his representative was very supportive and said that most
of the members of his party wanted one. However, when it was discovered
that the PUP members, in fact, wanted one with Clive Palmer’s photo
instead of Campbell Newman’s, apparently Clive went cold on the idea.



Senator Lambie, on the other hand…


All right, I’m making it up. In a country where people are arrested
for creating a public disturbance by waving while wearing a t-shirt, I
feel that I have to make that clear. Just as I feel that I feel I need
to make it clear that he was lucky that he wasn’t arrested under the
VLAD laws.



And, while I’m at it, I also feel that I have to set the record
straight on what I wrote about Abbott not visiting South Australia or
commenting on their bushfires. He went there “as soon as he could” and
offered them $4 million. Which is really extraordinarily generous. After
all, he only offered $5 million to Iraq!



Perhaps, John Cleese should have the final say!


Stupidity.


P.S. For those who have pointed out that I posted the wrong link, I’m
posting the accident as well, in case anyone is looking for it. (Yes,
yes, it is ironic that I post a link on stupidity and it’s the wrong
link, yes it is ironic, yes, this is why I could never be a member of
Abbott’s front bench because I can actually acknowledge when I make a
mistake, and clearly none of them can or we’d have mass resignations and
by-elections!)
This is the John Lloyd one which I accidentally posted which although it’s a little longer is thoroughly worth it: John Lloyd.